Dubray v. State

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Dubray v. State

739 S.W.2d 166, 293 Ark. 545, 1987 Ark. LEXIS 2418

DecidedNovember 16, 1987

StatusPublished

This text of 739 S.W.2d 166 (Dubray v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Arkansas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Dubray v. State, 739 S.W.2d 166, 293 Ark. 545, 1987 Ark. LEXIS 2418 (Ark. 1987).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Petitioner Keith Melvin Dubray, by his attorney, has filed a motion for a rule on the clerk. His attorney, James R. Marschewski, has by affidavit admitted it was his fault that the record was not timely tendered.

We find that the error, admittedly made by the criminal defendant’s attorney, is good cause to grant the motion for a rule on the clerk.

A copy of this opinion will be forwarded to the Committee on Professional Conduct.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

Petitioner Keith Melvin Dubray, by his attorney, has filed a motion for a rule on the clerk. His attorney, James R. Marschewski, has by affidavit admitted it was his fault that the record was not timely tendered.

We find that the error, admittedly made by the criminal defendant’s attorney, is good cause to grant the motion for a rule on the clerk.

A copy of this opinion will be forwarded to the Committee on Professional Conduct.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

739 S.W.2d 166, 293 Ark. 545, 1987 Ark. LEXIS 2418, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dubray-v-state-ark-1987.