Dubray v. State

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Dubray v. State

739 S.W.2d 166, 293 Ark. 545, 1987 Ark. LEXIS 2418

Supreme Court of Arkansas·Decided November 16, 1987·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Petitioner Keith Melvin Dubray, by his attorney, has filed a motion for a rule on the clerk. His attorney, James R. Marschewski, has by affidavit admitted it was his fault that the record was not timely tendered.

We find that the error, admittedly made by the criminal defendant’s attorney, is good cause to grant the motion for a rule on the clerk.

A copy of this opinion will be forwarded to the Committee on Professional Conduct.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

Petitioner Keith Melvin Dubray, by his attorney, has filed a motion for a rule on the clerk. His attorney, James R. Marschewski, has by affidavit admitted it was his fault that the record was not timely tendered.

We find that the error, admittedly made by the criminal defendant’s attorney, is good cause to grant the motion for a rule on the clerk.

A copy of this opinion will be forwarded to the Committee on Professional Conduct.

Dubray v. State, 739 S.W.2d 166, 293 Ark. 545, 1987 Ark. LEXIS 2418 (Ark. 1987).

Pincite

739 S.W.2d 166 (Dubray v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.