Dubose v. State

Alabama Court of Appeals

Dubose v. State

152 So. 57, 26 Ala. App. 47, 1934 Ala. App. LEXIS 3

Alabama Court of Appeals·Decided January 9, 1934·No. 3 Div. 739.·Published

Opinion

BRICKEN, Presiding Judge.

This prosecution originated in the county ■court. Appellant, defendant below, was charged with the offense of violating the prohibition law. From a judgment of conviction in the county court, an appeal was taken to the circuit court where he was again convicted, and he appeals here.

The action of the court in overruling the motion for a new trial, and the court’s refusal of the affirmative charge, cannot be considered on this appeal in the absence of a bill of exceptions. The appeal is predicated upon the record-proper only. The record appears regular in all things. Let the judgment of conviction from which this appeal was taken stand affirmed.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

BRICKEN, Presiding Judge.

This prosecution originated in the county ■court. Appellant, defendant below, was charged with the offense of violating the prohibition law. From a judgment of conviction in the county court, an appeal was taken to the circuit court where he was again convicted, and he appeals here.

The action of the court in overruling the motion for a new trial, and the court’s refusal of the affirmative charge, cannot be considered on this appeal in the absence of a bill of exceptions. The appeal is predicated upon the record-proper only. The record appears regular in all things. Let the judgment of conviction from which this appeal was taken stand affirmed.

Affirmed.

Dubose v. State, 152 So. 57, 26 Ala. App. 47, 1934 Ala. App. LEXIS 3 (Ala. Ct. App. 1934).

Pincite

152 So. 57 (Dubose v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.