Dubose v. State

152 So. 57, 26 Ala. App. 47, 1934 Ala. App. LEXIS 3
CourtAlabama Court of Appeals
DecidedJanuary 9, 1934
Docket3 Div. 739.
StatusPublished

This text of 152 So. 57 (Dubose v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Alabama Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Dubose v. State, 152 So. 57, 26 Ala. App. 47, 1934 Ala. App. LEXIS 3 (Ala. Ct. App. 1934).

Opinion

BRICKEN, Presiding Judge.

This prosecution originated in the county ■court. Appellant, defendant below, was charged with the offense of violating the prohibition law. From a judgment of conviction in the county court, an appeal was taken to the circuit court where he was again convicted, and he appeals here.

The action of the court in overruling the motion for a new trial, and the court’s refusal of the affirmative charge, cannot be considered on this appeal in the absence of a bill of exceptions. The appeal is predicated upon the record-proper only. The record appears regular in all things. Let the judgment of conviction from which this appeal was taken stand affirmed.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
152 So. 57, 26 Ala. App. 47, 1934 Ala. App. LEXIS 3, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dubose-v-state-alactapp-1934.