Dubose v. Parker

103 So. 625, 89 Fla. 334
Supreme Court of Florida·Decided April 1, 1925·Published

Opinion

Whitfield, J.

The writ .of error was allowed and taken to a final order remanding the petitioner to custody under *335 a municipal warrant charging that the petitioner did engage in, carry on and operate the business of operating motor vehicles for hire and for the transportation of persons for hire, without obtaining a license contrary to a municipal ordinance.

The Charter of the Town of Perry contains provisions that appear to be the only authority of the Town in the premises, viz:

“That the Town Council within the limitations of this Act .have power to levy and collect taxes upon all property and privileges taxable by law for State purposes; * to have full power and authority to levy and collect any amount of occupational tax on any business, profession or occupation, not to be less than fifty per cent, of the State tax; * to license, tax and regulate hackney carriages, auto busses, carts, omnibusses, automobiles fqr hire or private use.” Chap. 9886, Special Laws of 1923.

The “business of operating motor vehicles of any kind for hire, or for the transportation of persons or property for hire,” is not taxed by law for State purposes, therefore the above quotations from the Special Laws .of 1923, amending the Charter Act of the Town of Perry, do not authorize the municipality to adopt the ordinance under which the petitioner is charged with an offense.

Reversed.

West, C. J., and Ellis, Browne, Terrell and Strum, J. J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Dubose v. Parker, 103 So. 625, 89 Fla. 334 (Fla. 1925).

103 So. 625 (Dubose v. Parker) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.