Dubose v. Dubose
486 So. 2d 432, 1986 Ala. LEXIS 3488
Opinion
Because this Court does not interpret the trial court’s order imposing a temporary injunction as determining, or expressing any opinion upon, the ultimate substantive issue now pending before the trial court on the merits of the case, we affirm the trial court’s order granting a temporary injunction.
When the order of affirmance becomes final, the trial court is vested with the authority to vacate, to amend, to retain in full force and effect, or to enter any other appropriate order with respect to the subject of this appeal.
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Dubose v. Dubose, 486 So. 2d 432, 1986 Ala. LEXIS 3488 (Ala. 1986).
486 So. 2d 432 (Dubose v. Dubose) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Dubose v. Dubose
507 So. 2d 465 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1987)