Dubose v. Dubose

486 So. 2d 432, 1986 Ala. LEXIS 3488
Supreme Court of Alabama·Decided March 28, 1986·No. 84-1234·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Because this Court does not interpret the trial court’s order imposing a temporary injunction as determining, or expressing any opinion upon, the ultimate substantive issue now pending before the trial court on the merits of the case, we affirm the trial court’s order granting a temporary injunction.

When the order of affirmance becomes final, the trial court is vested with the authority to vacate, to amend, to retain in full force and effect, or to enter any other appropriate order with respect to the subject of this appeal.

AFFIRMED.

TORBERT, C.J., and MADDOX, JONES, SHORES and ADAMS, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Dubose v. Dubose, 486 So. 2d 432, 1986 Ala. LEXIS 3488 (Ala. 1986).

486 So. 2d 432 (Dubose v. Dubose) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Dubose v. Dubose
507 So. 2d 465 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1987)