DuBose v. Bank of Sparta
76 S.E. 864, 139 Ga. 115, 1912 Ga. LEXIS 551
Opinion
1. Where a bill of exceptions recited the filing of a petition, the making of an amendment thereto, the filing of a demurrer, the sustaining of it, and the dismissal of the case, “which was error,” this was a sufficient assignment of error to withstand a motion to dismiss the writ of error.
2. The petition set out no cause of action, and there was no error in sustaining the demurrer and dismissing the case.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
DuBose v. Bank of Sparta, 76 S.E. 864, 139 Ga. 115, 1912 Ga. LEXIS 551 (Ga. 1912).
76 S.E. 864 (DuBose v. Bank of Sparta) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Gunn v. Airbank of America Inc.
45 S.E.2d 789 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1947)
Tilley v. King
9 S.E.2d 670 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1940)
Mullis v. McCook
194 S.E. 171 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1937)
Greenwood v. Greenblatt
161 S.E. 135 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1931)
Ennis v. Simmerson
149 S.E. 67 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1929)
Hart v. Lee
114 S.E. 644 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1922)
Prince v. Evans
99 S.E. 132 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1919)