DuBois v. Perkins
This text of 31 P. 201 (DuBois v. Perkins) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Oregon Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Two exceptions to the evidence are presented by this record, neither of which is available. In both instances the object of the evidence was to contradict and weaken the evidence of the adverse party, and in matter and form was appropriate for that purpose.
Neither in the brief of counsel nor at the argument was any reason suggested or authority cited to show in what the errors consisted, and as we are unable to discover any, the judgment must be affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
31 P. 201, 23 Or. 144, 1892 Ore. LEXIS 118, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dubois-v-perkins-or-1892.