Dubois v. Dubois

555 P.2d 839, 92 Nev. 595
Nevada Supreme Court·Decided October 28, 1976·No. No. 8469·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

OPINION

Per Curiam:

Appellant contends the district court abused its discretion in failing to grant her motion to modify a decree of divorce. We disagree.

Pursuant to the modification provision of an integrated separation and property support agreement, appellant sought an increase in alimony payments from her husband. After a hearing, the district court denied her motion. We have reviewed the record and find no abuse of the district court’s discretion. Adler v. Adler, 80 Nev. 364, 394 P.2d 350 (1964); see: Porter v. Porter, 473 P.2d 538 (Mont. 1970); Moses v. Moses, 394 P.2d 601 (Colo. 1964); cf. Nace v. Nace, 489 P.2d 48 (Ariz. 1971); Gordon v. Gordon, 266 P.2d 786 (Wash. 1954).

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Dubois v. Dubois, 555 P.2d 839, 92 Nev. 595 (Neb. 1976).

555 P.2d 839 (Dubois v. Dubois) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Gilman v. Gilman
956 P.2d 761 (Nevada Supreme Court, 1998)