Dubois v. Dubois
This text of 555 P.2d 839 (Dubois v. Dubois) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Nevada Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
OPINION
Appellant contends the district court abused its discretion in failing to grant her motion to modify a decree of divorce. We disagree.
Pursuant to the modification provision of an integrated separation and property support agreement, appellant sought an increase in alimony payments from her husband. After a hearing, the district court denied her motion. We have reviewed the record and find no abuse of the district court’s discretion. Adler v. Adler, 80 Nev. 364, 394 P.2d 350 (1964); see: Porter v. Porter, 473 P.2d 538 (Mont. 1970); Moses v. Moses, 394 P.2d 601 (Colo. 1964); cf. Nace v. Nace, 489 P.2d 48 (Ariz. 1971); Gordon v. Gordon, 266 P.2d 786 (Wash. 1954).
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
555 P.2d 839, 92 Nev. 595, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dubois-v-dubois-nev-1976.