Home/Supreme Court of North Carolina/Dublin v. UCR, Inc.

Dublin v. UCR, Inc.

449 S.E.2d 569, 337 N.C. 800
CourtSupreme Court of North Carolina
DecidedOctober 5, 1994
DocketNo. 361P94
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 449 S.E.2d 569 (Dublin v. UCR, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Dublin v. UCR, Inc., 449 S.E.2d 569, 337 N.C. 800 (N.C. 1994).

Opinion

Motion by plaintiffs to dismiss the appeal by defendant (U-Can Rent, Inc. II) and third-party defendant (Voyager Property and Casualty Ins. Co.) for lack of substantial constitutional question allowed 5 October 1994. Petitions by defendant (U-Can Rent, Inc. II) and third-party defendant (Voyager Property and Casualty Ins. Co.) for discretionary review pursuant to G.S. 7A-31 denied 5 October 1994.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Stetser v. Tap Pharmaceutical Products, Inc.
598 S.E.2d 570 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 2004)
Pitts v. American Security Insurance
550 S.E.2d 179 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 2001)
Frost v. Mazda Motor of America, Inc.
540 S.E.2d 324 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 2000)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
449 S.E.2d 569, 337 N.C. 800, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dublin-v-ucr-inc-nc-1994.