Dublin Co. v. Typhoon Heat Pump Division of Hupp Corp.
191 So. 2d 82
Opinion
We have thoroughly examined the record in this case and no error having been made to appear, the decision of the trial court is hereby affirmed. See Fla. Investment Enterprises, Inc. v. Kentucky Co., 160 So.2d 733 (D.C.A.Fla.1964); Sugar v. Blek, 172 So.2d 272 (D.C.A.Fla.1965); Butler v. Butler, 172 So.2d 899 (D.C.A.Fla.1965); and Odum v. Morningstar, 158 So.2d 776 (D.C.A.Fla.1963).
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Dublin Co. v. Typhoon Heat Pump Division of Hupp Corp., 191 So. 2d 82 (Fla. Ct. App. 1966).
191 So. 2d 82 (Dublin Co. v. Typhoon Heat Pump Division of Hupp Corp.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Dublin Co. v. Typhoon Heat Pump Div. of Hupp Corporation.
200 So. 2d 810 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1967)