Dublin Co. v. Typhoon Heat Pump Division of Hupp Corp.

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Dublin Co. v. Typhoon Heat Pump Division of Hupp Corp.

191 So. 2d 82

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedOctober 5, 1966

DocketNo. 6019

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 191 So. 2d 82 (Dublin Co. v. Typhoon Heat Pump Division of Hupp Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Dublin Co. v. Typhoon Heat Pump Division of Hupp Corp., 191 So. 2d 82 (Fla. Ct. App. 1966).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We have thoroughly examined the record in this case and no error having been made to appear, the decision of the trial court is hereby affirmed. See Fla. Investment Enterprises, Inc. v. Kentucky Co., 160 So.2d 733 (D.C.A.Fla.1964); Sugar v. Blek, 172 So.2d 272 (D.C.A.Fla.1965); Butler v. Butler, 172 So.2d 899 (D.C.A.Fla.1965); and Odum v. Morningstar, 158 So.2d 776 (D.C.A.Fla.1963).

Affirmed.

LILES, Acting C. J., HOBSON, J., and WILLIS, ROBERT, Associate Judge, concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

We have thoroughly examined the record in this case and no error having been made to appear, the decision of the trial court is hereby affirmed. See Fla. Investment Enterprises, Inc. v. Kentucky Co., 160 So.2d 733 (D.C.A.Fla.1964); Sugar v. Blek, 172 So.2d 272 (D.C.A.Fla.1965); Butler v. Butler, 172 So.2d 899 (D.C.A.Fla.1965); and Odum v. Morningstar, 158 So.2d 776 (D.C.A.Fla.1963).

Affirmed.

LILES, Acting C. J., HOBSON, J., and WILLIS, ROBERT, Associate Judge, concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

191 So. 2d 82, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dublin-co-v-typhoon-heat-pump-division-of-hupp-corp-fladistctapp-1966.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack