Dubiner v. Dubiner

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Dubiner v. Dubiner

13 A.D.2d 642, 217 N.Y.S.2d 580, 1961 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11321

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedApril 20, 1961

StatusPublished

This text of 13 A.D.2d 642 (Dubiner v. Dubiner) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Dubiner v. Dubiner, 13 A.D.2d 642, 217 N.Y.S.2d 580, 1961 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11321 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1961).

Pincite

Opinion

Motion for leave to appeal as a poor person granted insofar as to permit the appeal to be heard on the original record, without printing the same, and upon typewritten or mimeographed appellant’s points, on condition that the appellant serves one copy of the typewritten or mimeographed appellant’s points upon the attorney for the petitioner-respondent and files 6 typewritten or 19 mimeographed copies of appellant’s points, together with the original record, with this court on or before August 15, 1961, with notice of argument for the September 1961 Term of this court, said appeal to be argued or submitted when reached. In all other respects, the motion is denied, Concur—Breitel, J, P., Rabin, Valente, McNally and Eager, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Motion for leave to appeal as a poor person granted insofar as to permit the appeal to be heard on the original record, without printing the same, and upon typewritten or mimeographed appellant’s points, on condition that the appellant serves one copy of the typewritten or mimeographed appellant’s points upon the attorney for the petitioner-respondent and files 6 typewritten or 19 mimeographed copies of appellant’s points, together with the original record, with this court on or before August 15, 1961, with notice of argument for the September 1961 Term of this court, said appeal to be argued or submitted when reached. In all other respects, the motion is denied, Concur—Breitel, J, P., Rabin, Valente, McNally and Eager, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

13 A.D.2d 642, 217 N.Y.S.2d 580, 1961 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11321, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dubiner-v-dubiner-nyappdiv-1961.