Dubicki v. Maresco

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Dubicki v. Maresco

54 A.D.2d 683, 387 N.Y.S.2d 267, 1976 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 14228

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided October 5, 1976·Published

Opinion

— In a consolidated negligence action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., defendants appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated March 31, 1976, which granted plaintiffs’ motion to increase the ad damnum clause to the extent of increasing the amount demanded by the injured plaintiff to $1,000,000. Order affirmed, without costs or disbursements. Trial Term properly exercised its discretion in permitting amendment of the ad damnum clause of the complaint to the extent indicated. Hopkins, Acting P. J., Margett, Damiani, Shapiro and Titone, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

— In a consolidated negligence action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., defendants appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated March 31, 1976, which granted plaintiffs’ motion to increase the ad damnum clause to the extent of increasing the amount demanded by the injured plaintiff to $1,000,000. Order affirmed, without costs or disbursements. Trial Term properly exercised its discretion in permitting amendment of the ad damnum clause of the complaint to the extent indicated. Hopkins, Acting P. J., Margett, Damiani, Shapiro and Titone, JJ., concur.

Dubicki v. Maresco, 54 A.D.2d 683, 387 N.Y.S.2d 267, 1976 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 14228 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1976).

Pincite

54 A.D.2d 683 (Dubicki v. Maresco) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.