Dube v. Gay

46 A. 1049, 69 N.H. 670
CourtSupreme Court of New Hampshire
DecidedJune 5, 1899
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 46 A. 1049 (Dube v. Gay) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Hampshire primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Dube v. Gay, 46 A. 1049, 69 N.H. 670 (N.H. 1899).

Opinion

Parsons, J.,

The motion should have been granted. There was no evidence that the defendant’s knowledge of the danger *671 from which, the injuries resulted was, or in the exercise of due care could have been, superior to that of the plaintiff’s intestate, who was injured. The case discloses no evidence upon which the jury could properly find for the plaintiff.

Verdict set aside: judgment for the defendant.

Peaslee, J., did not sit: the others concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Dziedzie v. Newmarket Manufacturing Co.
129 A. 271 (Supreme Court of New Hampshire, 1925)
Ahern v. Amoskeag Manufacturing Co.
71 A. 213 (Supreme Court of New Hampshire, 1908)
Gaudette v. Boston & Maine Railroad
64 A. 667 (Supreme Court of New Hampshire, 1906)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
46 A. 1049, 69 N.H. 670, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dube-v-gay-nh-1899.