Dube v. Gay

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Dube v. Gay

46 A. 1049, 69 N.H. 670

Supreme Court of New Hampshire·Decided June 5, 1899·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Parsons, J.,

The motion should have been granted. There was no evidence that the defendant’s knowledge of the danger *671 from which, the injuries resulted was, or in the exercise of due care could have been, superior to that of the plaintiff’s intestate, who was injured. The case discloses no evidence upon which the jury could properly find for the plaintiff.

Verdict set aside: judgment for the defendant.

Peaslee, J., did not sit: the others concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Parsons, J.,

The motion should have been granted. There was no evidence that the defendant’s knowledge of the danger *671 from which, the injuries resulted was, or in the exercise of due care could have been, superior to that of the plaintiff’s intestate, who was injured. The case discloses no evidence upon which the jury could properly find for the plaintiff.

Verdict set aside: judgment for the defendant.

Peaslee, J., did not sit: the others concurred.

Dube v. Gay, 46 A. 1049, 69 N.H. 670 (N.H. 1899).

Pincite

46 A. 1049 (Dube v. Gay) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related