Dube v. Dube
226 A.D. 744
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Dube v. Dube. Read the opinion of the Court — 230 A.D. 494 →
Opinion
Judgment reversed upon the law and new trial granted, costs to abide the event. The court committed error in ruling upon the evidence at foUos 109, 122, 163. One ruHng (Fol. 109) resulted in injecting into the case irrelevant prejudicial matter which aggravated the effect of counsel’s statements of Hke character in the opening (Fol. 35). Lazansky, P. J., Rich, Kapper, CarsweU and Scudder, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Dube v. Dube, 226 A.D. 744 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1929).
226 A.D. 744 (Dube v. Dube) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.