Duarte v. Stevens Markets, Inc.
This text of 159 So. 2d 236 (Duarte v. Stevens Markets, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
We have concluded after argument and a careful consideration of the record that the petition for writ of certiorari should be denied.
In connection with the contention that only two members of the full Commission heard and decided this case and that the Commission is not empowered to act unless all three members thereof hear and decide a case brought to the Commission for review we can only say that because “No objection to the absence of Commissioner Lightsey was interposed by counsel for any party to the cause” until the filing of the petition for a writ of certiorari in this Court the objection comes too late. See Wheeler v. Hendry Corporation, Fla., 70 So.2d 557.
The petition for writ of certiorari is denied.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
159 So. 2d 236, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/duarte-v-stevens-markets-inc-fla-1963.