Duarte v. Duarte

199 N.E.2d 554, 347 Mass. 778
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court·Decided June 1, 1964·Published

Opinion

Decree affirmed. The only question presented by the libellee’s appeal is whether on the reported evidence the judge was plainly wrong in entering a decree granting a divorce to the libellant on the ground of cruel and abusive treatment. The evidence was mainly oral and was conflicting. It is sufficient to say that the issue was one to be resolved by the judge who on this record cannot be said to be plainly wrong. Hamilton v. Hamilton, 325 Mass. 278, 279, and cases cited.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Duarte v. Duarte, 199 N.E.2d 554, 347 Mass. 778 (Mass. 1964).

199 N.E.2d 554 (Duarte v. Duarte) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Hamilton v. Hamilton
90 N.E.2d 322 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1950)