DUART v. Department of Correction
981 A.2d 1078, 293 Conn. 937, 2009 Conn. LEXIS 467
CourtSupreme Court of Connecticut
DecidedOctober 14, 2009
DocketSC 18476
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases
This text of 981 A.2d 1078 (DUART v. Department of Correction) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Connecticut primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
DUART v. Department of Correction, 981 A.2d 1078, 293 Conn. 937, 2009 Conn. LEXIS 467 (Colo. 2009).
Opinion
The plaintiffs petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 116 Conn. App. 758 (AC 29994), is granted, limited to the following issue:
“Whether the rule of Varley v. Varley, 180 Conn. 1, 428 A.2d 317 (1980), which requires a movant to demonstrate that the results at trial would have been different, applies to posttrial motions alleging knowing and deliberate discovery misconduct?”
NORCOTT and KATZ, Js., did not participate in the consideration of or decision on this petition.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Duart v. Department of Correction
34 A.3d 343 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 2012)
Simms v. Seaman
23 A.3d 1 (Connecticut Appellate Court, 2011)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
981 A.2d 1078, 293 Conn. 937, 2009 Conn. LEXIS 467, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/duart-v-department-of-correction-conn-2009.