DUART v. Department of Correction
981 A.2d 1078, 293 Conn. 937, 2009 Conn. LEXIS 467
Opinion
The plaintiffs petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 116 Conn. App. 758 (AC 29994), is granted, limited to the following issue:
“Whether the rule of Varley v. Varley, 180 Conn. 1, 428 A.2d 317 (1980), which requires a movant to demonstrate that the results at trial would have been different, applies to posttrial motions alleging knowing and deliberate discovery misconduct?”
NORCOTT and KATZ, Js., did not participate in the consideration of or decision on this petition.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
DUART v. Department of Correction, 981 A.2d 1078, 293 Conn. 937, 2009 Conn. LEXIS 467 (Colo. 2009).
981 A.2d 1078 (DUART v. Department of Correction) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Duart v. Department of Correction
34 A.3d 343 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 2012)
Simms v. Seaman
23 A.3d 1 (Connecticut Appellate Court, 2011)