Du Pont v. Bauduy

Court of Chancery of Delaware

Du Pont v. Bauduy

3 Del. Cas. 224

Court of Chancery of Delaware·Decided July 1, 1829·Published

Opinion

Account begins,

Hearing on the cross-bill exceptions above. Counsel for Bauduy (defendant to this cross-bill) argues that the Court of Chancery [225] has no jurisdiction in this cause since there is an adequate remedy at law. Counsel for Du Pont, (complainant in cross-bill) maintains that defendant cannot ignore the cross-bill, but can be required to plead, answer, or demur.

(At this point, the report ends abruptly.)

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Account begins,

Hearing on the cross-bill exceptions above. Counsel for Bauduy (defendant to this cross-bill) argues that the Court of Chancery [225] has no jurisdiction in this cause since there is an adequate remedy at law. Counsel for Du Pont, (complainant in cross-bill) maintains that defendant cannot ignore the cross-bill, but can be required to plead, answer, or demur.

(At this point, the report ends abruptly.)

Du Pont v. Bauduy, 3 Del. Cas. 224 (Del. Ct. App. 1829).

Pincite

3 Del. Cas. 224 (Du Pont v. Bauduy) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.