Du Bois Deposit Bank v. Kuntz
34 A. 797, 175 Pa. 432, 1896 Pa. LEXIS 1268
Opinion
In view of the practically undisputed evidence in support of the plaintiff’s claim, the learned trial judge was clearly right in withdrawing the case from the consideration of the jury and •directing them to render a verdict in favor of the bank for the .amount of the mortgage debt with interest from November 29, 1891. There is no question in the case that requires discussion. The assignments of error are both dismissed, and the judgment is affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Du Bois Deposit Bank v. Kuntz, 34 A. 797, 175 Pa. 432, 1896 Pa. LEXIS 1268 (Pa. 1896).
34 A. 797 (Du Bois Deposit Bank v. Kuntz) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Alliance Fin. Corp. Plain. v. Abrams
97 Pa. Super. 528 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1929)
Bonner v. Randal
7 Pa. D. & C. 294 (Montgomery County Court of Common Pleas, 1925)
Bartholomew v. Allentown National Bank
103 A. 954 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1918)
Kuhn v. Ogilvie
35 A. 957 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1896)