Du Bois Concrete Products Corp. v. Saddle Rock Homes Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Du Bois Concrete Products Corp. v. Saddle Rock Homes Corp.

1 A.D.2d 899, 150 N.Y.S.2d 557, 1956 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6039

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMarch 19, 1956

StatusPublished

This text of 1 A.D.2d 899 (Du Bois Concrete Products Corp. v. Saddle Rock Homes Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Du Bois Concrete Products Corp. v. Saddle Rock Homes Corp., 1 A.D.2d 899, 150 N.Y.S.2d 557, 1956 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6039 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1956).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal from an order dismissing the complaint for failure to serve a copy thereof upon Car-Vel Realty Corp., pursuant to section 257 of the Civil Practice Act. Order modified by adding to the ordering paragraph the words “ Car-Vel Realty Corp.” after the word “ defendant ” and the words “ as against said defendant Car-Vel Realty Corp.” after the word “complaint”. As so modified, order unanimously affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements to respondent. The motion having been made by respondent, the order should have provided that the complaint be dismissed only as against respondent. Present — Wenzel, Acting P. J., Beldock, Ughetta, Hallinan and Kleinfeld, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal from an order dismissing the complaint for failure to serve a copy thereof upon Car-Vel Realty Corp., pursuant to section 257 of the Civil Practice Act. Order modified by adding to the ordering paragraph the words “ Car-Vel Realty Corp.” after the word “ defendant ” and the words “ as against said defendant Car-Vel Realty Corp.” after the word “complaint”. As so modified, order unanimously affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements to respondent. The motion having been made by respondent, the order should have provided that the complaint be dismissed only as against respondent. Present — Wenzel, Acting P. J., Beldock, Ughetta, Hallinan and Kleinfeld, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1 A.D.2d 899, 150 N.Y.S.2d 557, 1956 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6039, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/du-bois-concrete-products-corp-v-saddle-rock-homes-corp-nyappdiv-1956.