D.T.W. v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

D.T.W. v. State

148 So. 3d 542, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 16730, 2014 WL 5100189

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedOctober 13, 2014

DocketNo. 1D14-0633

StatusPublished

This text of 148 So. 3d 542 (D.T.W. v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

D.T.W. v. State, 148 So. 3d 542, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 16730, 2014 WL 5100189 (Fla. Ct. App. 2014).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

In this Anders appeal, a Causey¹ order was issued directing the parties to brief the issue of whether the trial court erred in committing the appellant to a moderate-risk placement when the Department of Juvenile Justice (the Department) had recommended probation. See B.KA. v. State, 122 So.3d 928, 930 (Fla. 1st DCA 2013). The public defender recognized the error and asked this Court to reverse and remand pursuant to B.KA. The State concedes error. Accordingly, we AFFIRM the appellant’s adjudication of delinquency, but REVERSE the particulars of the commitment and REMAND with instructions for the trial court to receive a recommendation from the Department regarding a restrictiveness level before committing the appellant.

WOLF, ROBERTS, and ROWE, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

In this Anders appeal, a Causey¹ order was issued directing the parties to brief the issue of whether the trial court erred in committing the appellant to a moderate-risk placement when the Department of Juvenile Justice (the Department) had recommended probation. See B.KA. v. State, 122 So.3d 928, 930 (Fla. 1st DCA 2013). The public defender recognized the error and asked this Court to reverse and remand pursuant to B.KA. The State concedes error. Accordingly, we AFFIRM the appellant’s adjudication of delinquency, but REVERSE the particulars of the commitment and REMAND with instructions for the trial court to receive a recommendation from the Department regarding a restrictiveness level before committing the appellant.

WOLF, ROBERTS, and ROWE, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

148 So. 3d 542, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 16730, 2014 WL 5100189, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dtw-v-state-fladistctapp-2014.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack