D.T.N. v. State
826 So. 2d 365, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 7604, 2002 WL 1809102
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedMay 31, 2002
DocketNo. 2D00-4252
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases
This text of 826 So. 2d 365 (D.T.N. v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
D.T.N. v. State, 826 So. 2d 365, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 7604, 2002 WL 1809102 (Fla. Ct. App. 2002).
Opinion
Affirmed. See Pendarvis v. State, 752 So.2d 75, 76 (Fla. 2d DCA 2000) (holding that “[a] pretrial motion to suppress is not preserved for appellate review unless the defendant makes a specific contemporaneous objection at the time the evidence is admitted.”)
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Dessin v. State
868 So. 2d 613 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2004)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
826 So. 2d 365, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 7604, 2002 WL 1809102, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dtn-v-state-fladistctapp-2002.