D.T. v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

D.T. v. State

54 So. 3d 619, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 1970, 2011 WL 553766

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in D.T. v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 87 So. 3d 1235 →

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided February 18, 2011·No. No. 5D10-3406·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

D.T., a juvenile, appeals his adjudications of guilt regarding the charges of burglary of a structure, burglary of a conveyance, and loitering or prowling. We affirm the adjudications of guilt as to burglary of a structure and loitering or prowling without further comment. However, we reverse the adjudication of guilt as to burglary of a conveyance because the State offered no evidence that D.T. was one of the individuals seen inside or trying to enter the vehicle specified in the petition for delinquency.

AFFIRMED in part; REVERSED in part; and REMANDED.

PALMER, ORFINGER and COHEN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

D.T., a juvenile, appeals his adjudications of guilt regarding the charges of burglary of a structure, burglary of a conveyance, and loitering or prowling. We affirm the adjudications of guilt as to burglary of a structure and loitering or prowling without further comment. However, we reverse the adjudication of guilt as to burglary of a conveyance because the State offered no evidence that D.T. was one of the individuals seen inside or trying to enter the vehicle specified in the petition for delinquency.

AFFIRMED in part; REVERSED in part; and REMANDED.

PALMER, ORFINGER and COHEN, JJ., concur.

D.T. v. State, 54 So. 3d 619, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 1970, 2011 WL 553766 (Fla. Ct. App. 2011).

Pincite

54 So. 3d 619 (D.T. v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.