D.T. v. J.M.

District Court of Appeal of Florida

D.T. v. J.M.

241 So. 3d 912

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedFebruary 14, 2018

DocketCase No. 2D17–155

StatusPublished

This text of 241 So. 3d 912 (D.T. v. J.M.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

D.T. v. J.M., 241 So. 3d 912 (Fla. Ct. App. 2018).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

*913D.T., the father, challenges the final judgment of paternity. Although an Interim Order Pending Final Hearing dated July 19, 2016, included a child support guidelines worksheet as an attachment, no such worksheet was attached to the final judgment. And the child support calculations in the final judgment differ from those in the worksheet attached to the interim order without sufficient explanation in the record. See Dep't of Revenue ex rel. R.S.M. v. B.J.M., 127 So.3d 859, 861 (Fla. 2d DCA 2013). We therefore reverse and remand for recalculation of child support. The final judgment of paternity is affirmed in all other respects.

Affirmed in part, reversed in part, and remanded.

KELLY, BLACK, and SALARIO, JJ., Concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

*913D.T., the father, challenges the final judgment of paternity. Although an Interim Order Pending Final Hearing dated July 19, 2016, included a child support guidelines worksheet as an attachment, no such worksheet was attached to the final judgment. And the child support calculations in the final judgment differ from those in the worksheet attached to the interim order without sufficient explanation in the record. See Dep't of Revenue ex rel. R.S.M. v. B.J.M., 127 So.3d 859, 861 (Fla. 2d DCA 2013). We therefore reverse and remand for recalculation of child support. The final judgment of paternity is affirmed in all other respects.

Affirmed in part, reversed in part, and remanded.

KELLY, BLACK, and SALARIO, JJ., Concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

241 So. 3d 912, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dt-v-jm-fladistctapp-2018.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack