D.T. v. J.M.

241 So. 3d 912
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided February 14, 2018·No. Case No. 2D17–155·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

*913D.T., the father, challenges the final judgment of paternity. Although an Interim Order Pending Final Hearing dated July 19, 2016, included a child support guidelines worksheet as an attachment, no such worksheet was attached to the final judgment. And the child support calculations in the final judgment differ from those in the worksheet attached to the interim order without sufficient explanation in the record. See Dep't of Revenue ex rel. R.S.M. v. B.J.M., 127 So.3d 859, 861 (Fla. 2d DCA 2013). We therefore reverse and remand for recalculation of child support. The final judgment of paternity is affirmed in all other respects.

Affirmed in part, reversed in part, and remanded.

KELLY, BLACK, and SALARIO, JJ., Concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

D.T. v. J.M., 241 So. 3d 912 (Fla. Ct. App. 2018).

241 So. 3d 912 (D.T. v. J.M.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Department of Revenue ex rel. R.S.M. v. B.J.M.
127 So. 3d 859 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2013)