D.T. v. J.M.
Opinion
*913D.T., the father, challenges the final judgment of paternity. Although an Interim Order Pending Final Hearing dated July 19, 2016, included a child support guidelines worksheet as an attachment, no such worksheet was attached to the final judgment. And the child support calculations in the final judgment differ from those in the worksheet attached to the interim order without sufficient explanation in the record. See Dep't of Revenue ex rel. R.S.M. v. B.J.M.,
Affirmed in part, reversed in part, and remanded.
KELLY, BLACK, and SALARIO, JJ., Concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
241 So. 3d 912 (D.T. v. J.M.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.