DT v. Department of Children and Families

District Court of Appeal of Florida

DT v. Department of Children and Families

6 So. 3d 717, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 3258, 2009 WL 1024589

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided April 13, 2009·No. 5D08-3718·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

See G.M. v. Dep’t of Children and Families, 969 So.2d 569, 571 (Fla. 1st DCA 2007) (“Although Appellant raises various points regarding possible defects in the procedural posture of this case, it does not appear that any of his claims were argued below. Thus, any objections ... have been waived and are not preserved for our review.”) (citations omitted); C.W. v. Dep’t of Children and Family Servs., 944 So.2d 1197, 1199 n. 2 (Fla. 3d DCA 2006) (noting that a trial court must be affirmed as to its factual findings when those findings are supported by competent, substantial evidence).

AFFIRMED.

PALMER, C.J., MONACO and LAWSON, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

See G.M. v. Dep’t of Children and Families, 969 So.2d 569, 571 (Fla. 1st DCA 2007) (“Although Appellant raises various points regarding possible defects in the procedural posture of this case, it does not appear that any of his claims were argued below. Thus, any objections ... have been waived and are not preserved for our review.”) (citations omitted); C.W. v. Dep’t of Children and Family Servs., 944 So.2d 1197, 1199 n. 2 (Fla. 3d DCA 2006) (noting that a trial court must be affirmed as to its factual findings when those findings are supported by competent, substantial evidence).

AFFIRMED.

PALMER, C.J., MONACO and LAWSON, JJ., concur.

DT v. Department of Children and Families, 6 So. 3d 717, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 3258, 2009 WL 1024589 (Fla. Ct. App. 2009).

Pincite

6 So. 3d 717 (DT v. Department of Children and Families) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related