D.T., a Child v. State of Florida

185 So. 3d 622, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 1452, 2016 WL 424654
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided February 3, 2016·No. 4D15-3130·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

In this Anders 1 appeal, we affirm the finding of guilt, the withholding of adjudication of delinquency, and the placement of the child on probation, but remand for the trial court to correct the delinquency disposition order to reflect all of the required information (the maximum penalty and whether the child spent any time in secure detention before disposition). See Fla. R. Juv. P. 8.115(d); A.M.R. v. State, 134 So.3d 502, 503 (Fla. 4th DCA 2014); D.B. v. State, 114 So.3d 1121, 1121-22 (Fla. 2d DCA 2013).

Affirmed.

TAYLOR, MAY and KLINGENSMITH, JJ., concur.
1

. Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

D.T., a Child v. State of Florida, 185 So. 3d 622, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 1452, 2016 WL 424654 (Fla. Ct. App. 2016).

185 So. 3d 622 (D.T., a Child v. State of Florida) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Anders v. California
386 U.S. 738 (Supreme Court, 1967)
D.B. v. State
114 So. 3d 1121 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2013)
A.M.R. v. State
134 So. 3d 502 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2014)