D.S. v. State

449 So. 2d 415, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 12973
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedMay 8, 1984
DocketNo. 82-2577
StatusPublished

This text of 449 So. 2d 415 (D.S. v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
D.S. v. State, 449 So. 2d 415, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 12973 (Fla. Ct. App. 1984).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The adjudication of delinquency below is supported by one of the respondent’s confessions in evidence which — unlike Harper v. State, 411 So.2d 235 (Fla. 3d DCA 1982), upon which she relies — is thoroughly inconsistent with both her exculpatory testimony at trial and her other extra judicial statements. State v. Frazier, 407 So.2d 1087 (Fla. 3d DCA 1982).

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Frazier
407 So. 2d 1087 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1982)
Harper v. State
411 So. 2d 235 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1982)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
449 So. 2d 415, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 12973, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ds-v-state-fladistctapp-1984.