D.S. v. State
449 So. 2d 415, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 12973
Opinion
The adjudication of delinquency below is supported by one of the respondent’s confessions in evidence which — unlike Harper v. State, 411 So.2d 235 (Fla. 3d DCA 1982), upon which she relies — is thoroughly inconsistent with both her exculpatory testimony at trial and her other extra judicial statements. State v. Frazier, 407 So.2d 1087 (Fla. 3d DCA 1982).
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
D.S. v. State, 449 So. 2d 415, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 12973 (Fla. Ct. App. 1984).
449 So. 2d 415 (D.S. v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
State v. Frazier
407 So. 2d 1087 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1982)
Harper v. State
411 So. 2d 235 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1982)