D.S. v. Florida Department of Children & Families

213 So. 3d 963, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 15404
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided October 16, 2015·No. No. 1D15-3897·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Upon consideration of the appellant’s response to the Court’s order of September 28, 2015, the Court has determined that the appellant has failed to demonstrate that the appeal was timely filed. See St. Moritz Hotel v. Daughtry, 249 So.2d 27 (Fla.1971); Churchville v. Ocean Grove R.V. Sales, Inc., 876 So.2d 649, 651 (Fla. 1st DCA 2004) (“An amendment or modification of an order or judgment in an immaterial, insubstantial way does not restart the clock to file an appeal”). Accordingly, the appeal is hereby dismissed. Any remedy the appellant may have lies [964]*964with the lower tribunal. See In the Interest of E.H., 609 So.2d 1289 (Fla.1992).

BENTON, ROWE, and OSTERHAUS, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

D.S. v. Florida Department of Children & Families, 213 So. 3d 963, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 15404 (Fla. Ct. App. 2015).

213 So. 3d 963 (D.S. v. Florida Department of Children & Families) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Churchville v. Ocean Grove RV Sales, Inc.
876 So. 2d 649 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2004)
St. Moritz Hotel v. Daughtry
249 So. 2d 27 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1971)
In the Interest of E.H.
609 So. 2d 1289 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1992)