Drzewinski v. ATL. SCAFFOLD & LADDER CO., INC.
70 N.Y.2d 999
This text of 70 N.Y.2d 999 (Drzewinski v. ATL. SCAFFOLD & LADDER CO., INC.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Drzewinski v. ATL. SCAFFOLD & LADDER CO., INC., 70 N.Y.2d 999 (N.Y. 1988).
Opinion
Richard Drzewinski et al., Respondents,
v.
Atlantic Scaffold & Ladder Co., Inc., et al., Appellants, et al., Defendant.
Bowery Savings Bank, Third-Party Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Rambusch Decorating Co., Third-Party Defendant-Respondent.
Swanke Hayden Connell Architects, Third-Party Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Rambusch Decorating Co., Third-Party Defendant-Respondent.
Court of Appeals of the State of New York.
Judge TITONE taking no part.
Motion to amend remittitur dismissed as untimely (22 NYCRR 500.11 [g] [3]). [See, 70 N.Y.2d 774.]
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Richard Drzewinski v. Atlantic Scaffold & Ladder Co.
515 N.E.2d 902 (New York Court of Appeals, 1987)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
70 N.Y.2d 999, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/drzewinski-v-atl-scaffold-ladder-co-inc-ny-1988.