Drye v. Radiator Specialty Co.

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Drye v. Radiator Specialty Co.

219 N.C. 863

DecidedApril 30, 1941

StatusPublished

This text of 219 N.C. 863 (Drye v. Radiator Specialty Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Drye v. Radiator Specialty Co., 219 N.C. 863 (N.C. 1941).

Pincite

Opinion

Peb Cubiam.

Tbe evidence is rather voluminous and is quite contradictory as between that of tbe plaintiff and that of tbe defendant. Tbe evidence of tbe plaintiff, if believed, was fully adequate to maintain bis contentions, and tbe evidence of tbe defendant, if believed, was sufficient to defeat him.

[864]*864It was peculiarly a jury case, and the jury has spoken. We find nothing in the exceptions of the defendant that would justify a new trial.

No error.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Peb Cubiam.

Tbe evidence is rather voluminous and is quite contradictory as between that of tbe plaintiff and that of tbe defendant. Tbe evidence of tbe plaintiff, if believed, was fully adequate to maintain bis contentions, and tbe evidence of tbe defendant, if believed, was sufficient to defeat him.

[864]*864It was peculiarly a jury case, and the jury has spoken. We find nothing in the exceptions of the defendant that would justify a new trial.

No error.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

219 N.C. 863, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/drye-v-radiator-specialty-co-nc-1941.