Dry v. Charlotte Coca-Cola Bottling Co.

204 N.C. 222
Supreme Court of North Carolina·Decided February 22, 1933·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Pee. Cubiam.

The charge of the court is not in the record, and it is therefore presumed that the trial judge correctly instructed the jury upon all phases of the evidence. The facts bring the case within the rules of liability heretofore declared in Perry v. Bottling Co., 196 N. C., 175, 145 S. E., 14, and Broom v. Bottling Co., 200 N. C., 55, 156 S. E., 152.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Dry v. Charlotte Coca-Cola Bottling Co., 204 N.C. 222 (N.C. 1933).

204 N.C. 222 (Dry v. Charlotte Coca-Cola Bottling Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Sears
70 S.E.2d 907 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1952)