Dry v. Charlotte Coca-Cola Bottling Co.
204 N.C. 222
This text of 204 N.C. 222 (Dry v. Charlotte Coca-Cola Bottling Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Dry v. Charlotte Coca-Cola Bottling Co., 204 N.C. 222 (N.C. 1933).
Opinion
The charge of the court is not in the record, and it is therefore presumed that the trial judge correctly instructed the jury upon all phases of the evidence. The facts bring the case within the rules of liability heretofore declared in Perry v. Bottling Co., 196 N. C., 175, 145 S. E., 14, and Broom v. Bottling Co., 200 N. C., 55, 156 S. E., 152.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
State v. Sears
70 S.E.2d 907 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1952)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
204 N.C. 222, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dry-v-charlotte-coca-cola-bottling-co-nc-1933.