Dry v. Charlotte Coca-Cola Bottling Co.
204 N.C. 222
Opinion
The charge of the court is not in the record, and it is therefore presumed that the trial judge correctly instructed the jury upon all phases of the evidence. The facts bring the case within the rules of liability heretofore declared in Perry v. Bottling Co., 196 N. C., 175, 145 S. E., 14, and Broom v. Bottling Co., 200 N. C., 55, 156 S. E., 152.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Dry v. Charlotte Coca-Cola Bottling Co., 204 N.C. 222 (N.C. 1933).
204 N.C. 222 (Dry v. Charlotte Coca-Cola Bottling Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
State v. Sears
70 S.E.2d 907 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1952)