Drusin v. Hinds Bros.

Mississippi Supreme Court

Drusin v. Hinds Bros.

54 So. 956, 99 Miss. 304

Mississippi Supreme Court·Decided March 15, 1911·Published

Opinion

McLain, C.

This was a suit instituted by A. & M. Drusin against Hinds Bros. & Co., in a justice of the peace court of Lee county, on open account for goods sold and delivered to them. Appellants obtained judgment in the justice court. Hinds Bros. & Co. appealed to the circuit court of Lee [309]*309county, where judgment was rendered in favor of appellees. Appellants appeal to this court.

After a most thorough investigation of this record, we are of the opinion that the trial judge should have given the peremptory instruction asked by appellants, A.. & M. Drusin. . Reversed'and remanded.

Per Curiam.

The above opinion is adopted as the opinion of the court, and, for the reasons therein indicated by the commissioner, the case is reversed and remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

McLain, C.

This was a suit instituted by A. & M. Drusin against Hinds Bros. & Co., in a justice of the peace court of Lee county, on open account for goods sold and delivered to them. Appellants obtained judgment in the justice court. Hinds Bros. & Co. appealed to the circuit court of Lee [309]*309county, where judgment was rendered in favor of appellees. Appellants appeal to this court.

After a most thorough investigation of this record, we are of the opinion that the trial judge should have given the peremptory instruction asked by appellants, A.. & M. Drusin. . Reversed'and remanded.

Per Curiam.

The above opinion is adopted as the opinion of the court, and, for the reasons therein indicated by the commissioner, the case is reversed and remanded.

Drusin v. Hinds Bros., 54 So. 956, 99 Miss. 304 (Mich. 1911).

Pincite

54 So. 956 (Drusin v. Hinds Bros.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.