Drury v. State

25 Tex. 45
Texas Supreme Court·Decided July 1, 1860·Published·Cited by 7 cases

Opinion

Roberts, J.

As to the credibility of the witnesses, in case of conflict or apparent contradiction, we think the judge below in far better situation to determine than this court, and therefore, generally, great deference must be paid to the construction placed upon it by him, as discovered in the judgment he has pronounced.

Thus regarding the facts, then, as presented in this case, we are of opinion that they show, with reasonable certainty, that the prisoner has been guilty of murder with express malice, and that therefore we cannot say that the judge erred in refusing bail.

[53] The legal principles applicable to this case are developed in the ease of McCoy v. The State, just decided.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Drury v. State, 25 Tex. 45 (Tex. 1860).

25 Tex. 45 (Drury v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Shaw v. State
257 S.W. 885 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1924)
Ex Parte Ross
251 S.W. 233 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1923)
Ex Parte Good
251 S.W. 233 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1923)
In re Scott
56 N.W. 1009 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 1893)
Ex parte Beacom
12 Tex. Ct. App. 318 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1882)
Ex parte Moore
5 Tex. Ct. App. 103 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1878)