Drury v. Drury

Missouri Court of Appeals

Drury v. Drury

878 S.W.2d 478, 1994 Mo. App. LEXIS 864, 1994 WL 226820

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided May 31, 1994·No. No. 64436·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Father appeals from a modification order which increased the amount he pays for child support.

An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

[479]*479The judgment is affirmed in accordance ■with Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Father appeals from a modification order which increased the amount he pays for child support.

An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

[479]*479The judgment is affirmed in accordance ■with Rule 84.16(b).

Drury v. Drury, 878 S.W.2d 478, 1994 Mo. App. LEXIS 864, 1994 WL 226820 (Mo. Ct. App. 1994).

Pincite

878 S.W.2d 478 (Drury v. Drury) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.