Drummond v. Lamar

58 So. 194, 177 Ala. 530, 1912 Ala. LEXIS 210
CourtSupreme Court of Alabama
DecidedApril 4, 1912
StatusPublished

This text of 58 So. 194 (Drummond v. Lamar) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Alabama primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Drummond v. Lamar, 58 So. 194, 177 Ala. 530, 1912 Ala. LEXIS 210 (Ala. 1912).

Opinion

SAYRE, J.

What purports to be a bill of exceptions in the record has never been signed by the judge who presided at the trial, nor has any effort been made to have it established. The judge before whom the trial was had went off the bench shortly thereafter. The bill was presented to his successor. Appellant’s remedy was [531]*531to move to establish the bill on the next call of the division, as provided by section 3022 of the Code. No such step has been taken. There is no assignment of error upon the rulings on the pleadings. The judgment must be affirmed.

Affirmed.

Dowdell, C. J., and Simpson, Anderson, and Somerville, JJ., concur. McClellan and Mayfield, JJ., not sitting.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
58 So. 194, 177 Ala. 530, 1912 Ala. LEXIS 210, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/drummond-v-lamar-ala-1912.