Drummond v. Breitenbach

District Court, D. Nevada·Decided December 30, 2024·No. 3:24-cv-00504·Unknown

Opinion

1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 3

4 BRADLEY DRUMMOND, Case No. 3:24-cv-00504-ART-CLB

5 Petitioner, ORDER

6 v.

7 NETHANJAH BREITENBACH, et al.,

8 Respondents.

9 10 On November 13, 2024, Bradley Drummond, an individual incarcerated at 11 Nevada’s Lovelock Correctional Center, submitted for filing an application to 12 proceed in forma pauperis (ECF No. 1), a petition for writ of habeas corpus 13 pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (ECF No. 1-1) and a motion for appointment of 14 counsel (ECF No. 1-2). The application to proceed in forma pauperis was denied 15 because it was incomplete, and the habeas petition and motion for appointment 16 of counsel were not filed. (ECF No. 3.) The Court gave Drummond an opportunity 17 to file a new application to proceed in forma pauperis and provided him the 18 necessary forms and instructions to do so. (Id.) 19 On December 5, 2024, Drummond filed a new—and this time complete— 20 application to proceed in forma pauperis. (ECF No. 4.) Drummond’s December 5 21 application will be granted, and his petition and motion for appointment of 22 counsel will be filed. 23 The Court has examined Drummond’s habeas petition pursuant to Rule 4 24 of the Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases. The Court will order the petition 25 served on the respondents. 26 A prisoner not sentenced to death petitioning for a writ of habeas corpus 27 in federal court is not entitled to appointed counsel unless the circumstances 1 Chaney v. Gonzales, 801 F.2d 1191, 1196 (9th Cir. 1986) (citing Kreiling v. Field, 2 431 F.2d 638, 640 (9th Cir. 1970) (per curiam). The court may, however, appoint 3 counsel if the interests of justice so require. See 18 U.S.C. § 3006A; see also Rule 4 8(c), Rules Governing § 2254 Cases; Chaney, 801 F.2d at 1196. The Court finds 5 that appointment of counsel for Drummond is in the interests of justice and will 6 grant Drummond’s motion for appointment of counsel. 7 It is therefore ordered that Petitioner’s Application to Proceed in Forma 8 Pauperis (ECF No. 4) is granted. Petitioner will not be required to pay the filing 9 fee for this action. 10 The Clerk of the Court is directed to separately file Petitioner’s Petition for 11 Writ of Habeas Corpus (ECF No. 1-1) and Petitioner’s Motion for Appointment of 12 Counsel (ECF No. 1-2). 13 It is further ordered that Petitioner’s Motion for Appointment of Counsel 14 (ECF No. 1-2) is granted. The Federal Public Defender for the District of Nevada 15 (FPD) is appointed to represent the petitioner. If the FPD is unable to represent 16 the petitioner, because of a conflict of interest or other reason, alternate counsel 17 will be appointed. In either case, counsel will represent the petitioner in all 18 federal court proceedings relating to this matter, unless allowed to withdraw. 19 It is further ordered that the Clerk of the Court is directed to electronically 20 serve upon the FPD a copy of this order, together with a copy of the Petition for 21 Writ of Habeas Corpus (ECF No. 1-1). 22 It is further ordered that the FPD will have 30 days from the date of this 23 order to file a notice of appearance or to indicate to the Court their inability to 24 represent the petitioner in this case. 25 It is further ordered that the Clerk of the Court is directed to add Aaron 26 Ford, Attorney General of the State of Nevada, as counsel for Respondents and 27 to provide Respondents an electronic copy of all items previously filed in this 1 || General only. 2 It is further ordered that the respondents will have 30 days from the date 3 || of this order to appear in this action. Respondents will not be required to respond 4 || to the habeas petition at this time. 5 DATED THIS 30th day of December, 2024. 6 Ans □ losed Jer ANNE R. TRAUM 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Drummond v. Breitenbach, (D. Nev. 2024).

Drummond v. Breitenbach (Drummond v. Breitenbach) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related