Drummond, G., Pet v. Ct. Com. Pleas Phila. Cty.

CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania
DecidedFebruary 2, 2017
Docket205 EM 2016
StatusPublished

This text of Drummond, G., Pet v. Ct. Com. Pleas Phila. Cty. (Drummond, G., Pet v. Ct. Com. Pleas Phila. Cty.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Drummond, G., Pet v. Ct. Com. Pleas Phila. Cty., (Pa. 2017).

Opinion

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA EASTERN DISTRICT

GERALD DRUMMOND, : No. 205 EM 2016 : Petitioner : : : v. : : : PHILADELPHIA COURT OF COMMON : PLEAS PENNSYLVANIA, : : Respondent :

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 2nd day of February, 2017, the Application for Leave to File

Original Process and the Petition for Writ of Mandamus, to the extent it seeks to compel

the Court of Common Pleas of Philadelphia County to adjudicate Petitioner’s motion for

appointment of counsel, are GRANTED. The Court of Common Pleas of Philadelphia

County is DIRECTED to adjudicate the motion for appointment of counsel within 45

days.

The Application for Stay is DISMISSED AS MOOT.

The Prothonotary is DIRECTED to serve this order on the President Judge of the

Court of Common Pleas of Philadelphia County.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Drummond, G., Pet v. Ct. Com. Pleas Phila. Cty., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/drummond-g-pet-v-ct-com-pleas-phila-cty-pa-2017.