Drummett v. State

328 So. 2d 457, 1976 Fla. App. LEXIS 14834
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided March 12, 1976·No. No. 75-839·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The trial court erred in denying defendant’s motion to suppress his statements in that they were clearly induced by improper promises of a police officer. Appellant’s other points are without merit. We reverse and remand upon authority of Jarriel v. State, 317 So.2d 141 (Fla.App. 4th, 1975) and M. D. B. v. State, 311 So.2d 399 (Fla.App. 4th 1975).

Reversed and remanded.

WALDEN, C. J., DOWNEY, J., and MORROW, RUSSELL O., Associate Judge, concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Drummett v. State, 328 So. 2d 457, 1976 Fla. App. LEXIS 14834 (Fla. Ct. App. 1976).

328 So. 2d 457 (Drummett v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Jarriel v. State
317 So. 2d 141 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1975)
In the Interest of M. D. B. v. State
311 So. 2d 399 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1975)