Drummett v. State

328 So. 2d 457, 1976 Fla. App. LEXIS 14834
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedMarch 12, 1976
DocketNo. 75-839
StatusPublished

This text of 328 So. 2d 457 (Drummett v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Drummett v. State, 328 So. 2d 457, 1976 Fla. App. LEXIS 14834 (Fla. Ct. App. 1976).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The trial court erred in denying defendant’s motion to suppress his statements in that they were clearly induced by improper promises of a police officer. Appellant’s other points are without merit. We reverse and remand upon authority of Jarriel v. State, 317 So.2d 141 (Fla.App. 4th, 1975) and M. D. B. v. State, 311 So.2d 399 (Fla.App. 4th 1975).

Reversed and remanded.

WALDEN, C. J., DOWNEY, J., and MORROW, RUSSELL O., Associate Judge, concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Jarriel v. State
317 So. 2d 141 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1975)
In the Interest of M. D. B. v. State
311 So. 2d 399 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1975)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
328 So. 2d 457, 1976 Fla. App. LEXIS 14834, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/drummett-v-state-fladistctapp-1976.