Drum v. Shaull Equipment & Supply Co.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Drum v. Shaull Equipment & Supply Co.

772 A.2d 414, 565 Pa. 176, 2001 Pa. LEXIS 1041

CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania

DecidedMay 11, 2001

DocketAppeal No. 687 WAL 2000

StatusPublished

This text of 772 A.2d 414 (Drum v. Shaull Equipment & Supply Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Drum v. Shaull Equipment & Supply Co., 772 A.2d 414, 565 Pa. 176, 2001 Pa. LEXIS 1041 (Pa. 2001).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 11th day of May, 2001, the petition for allowance of appeal is GRANTED, LIMITED to the issue of whether the Superior Court’s analysis was in accord with the standard enunciated in Harman v. Borah, 562 Pa. 455, 756 A.2d 1116 (2000). Furthermore, the order of the Superior Court is VACATED and the matter REMANDED for reconsideration in light of the Harman decision.

Justice THOMAS G. SAYLOR dissents.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 11th day of May, 2001, the petition for allowance of appeal is GRANTED, LIMITED to the issue of whether the Superior Court’s analysis was in accord with the standard enunciated in Harman v. Borah, 562 Pa. 455, 756 A.2d 1116 (2000). Furthermore, the order of the Superior Court is VACATED and the matter REMANDED for reconsideration in light of the Harman decision.

Justice THOMAS G. SAYLOR dissents.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

772 A.2d 414, 565 Pa. 176, 2001 Pa. LEXIS 1041, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/drum-v-shaull-equipment-supply-co-pa-2001.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack