Drum v. Kelly

34 Pa. 415
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided July 1, 1859·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Woodward, J.

We approve of the conclusion which the learned judge deduced from the conflicting authorities on the point in judgment. Drum’s judgment never bound the land which Brown conveyed to Mrs. Kelly, and, therefore, she was not, according to the better authorities, concluded by the two writs of scire facias served on her as terre tenant.

Referring ourselves to the reasons and authorities of the court below, we affirm the judgment. '

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Drum v. Kelly, 34 Pa. 415 (Pa. 1859).

34 Pa. 415 (Drum v. Kelly) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Cancilla v. Bondy
44 A.2d 586 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1945)
Handel & Hayden Building & Loan Ass'n v. Elleford
101 A. 951 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1917)
Gibbs v. Tiffany
4 Pa. Super. 29 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1897)