Drum v. Drum
This text of 1926 OK 616 (Drum v. Drum) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This is .a divorce action. Defendant in error was decreed a divorce by the district court ofi Osage county on the 21st day of November, 1925. On the 24th day of November, 1925, plaintiff in error filed a motion for a new trial, and also filed no *124 tice of intenticn to appeal, as provided in divorce actions. On the 7th day of December, 1925, motion for a new trial was overruled and plaintiff in error gave notice of appeal and was given 60 days in which to serve case-made, which expired on the 5th day of February, 1926. Case-made was served on the 5th day of March, 1926, one month after the time for service had expired. A case-made served after the expiration.-of the time for service is a nullity and confers no jurisdiction on the Supreme Court to review the appeal. The appeal is dismissed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
1926 OK 616, 248 P. 569, 121 Okla. 123, 1926 Okla. LEXIS 73, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/drum-v-drum-okla-1926.