Drug Co. v. . McCreary

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Drug Co. v. . McCreary

166 S.E. 925, 203 N.C. 852, 1932 N.C. LEXIS 116

DecidedNovember 9, 1932

StatusPublished

This text of 166 S.E. 925 (Drug Co. v. . McCreary) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Drug Co. v. . McCreary, 166 S.E. 925, 203 N.C. 852, 1932 N.C. LEXIS 116 (N.C. 1932).

Pincite

Opinion

Judgment was rendered upon the following verdict and the defendants appealed:

Was the plaintiff injured by the negligence of the defendants in failing to serve the execution upon the Eureka Drug Company and levy upon the property of the Eureka Drug Company as alleged? Answer: Yes.

What damage, if any, is the plaintiff entitled to recover? Answer: $263.72. We find no error that would entitle the defendants to a nonsuit or a new trial.

No error.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Judgment was rendered upon the following verdict and the defendants appealed:

Was the plaintiff injured by the negligence of the defendants in failing to serve the execution upon the Eureka Drug Company and levy upon the property of the Eureka Drug Company as alleged? Answer: Yes.

What damage, if any, is the plaintiff entitled to recover? Answer: $263.72. We find no error that would entitle the defendants to a nonsuit or a new trial.

No error.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

166 S.E. 925, 203 N.C. 852, 1932 N.C. LEXIS 116, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/drug-co-v-mccreary-nc-1932.