Drue Allen Hollis v. University of North Texas Health Science Center
Opinion
In the Court of Appeals Second Appellate District of Texas at Fort Worth ___________________________ No. 02-19-00204-CV ___________________________
DRUE ALLEN HOLLIS, Appellant
V.
UNIVERSITY OF NORTH TEXAS HEALTH SCIENCE CENTER, Appellee
On Appeal from the 352nd District Court Tarrant County, Texas Trial Court No. 352-301866-18
Per Curiam Memorandum Opinion MEMORANDUM OPINION AND JUDGMENT
On July 29, 2019, we notified appellant that his brief had not been filed as the
appellate rules require. See Tex. R. App. P. 38.6(a). We stated that we could dismiss
the appeal for want of prosecution unless, within ten days, appellant filed with the
court an appellant’s brief and an accompanying motion reasonably explaining the
brief’s untimely filing and why an extension was needed. See Tex. R. App. P. 10.5(b),
38.8(a)(1), 42.3(b). Appellant has not filed the brief and motion in accordance with
our notice.
Because appellant has failed to file a brief even after we afforded an
opportunity to explain the initial failure, we dismiss the appeal for want of
prosecution. See Tex. R. App. P. 38.8(a)(1), 42.3(b), 43.2(f).
Per Curiam
Delivered: August 22, 2019
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Drue Allen Hollis v. University of North Texas Health Science Center (Drue Allen Hollis v. University of North Texas Health Science Center) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.