Druckman v. Forsyth Furniture Lines, Inc.

Fourth Circuit

Druckman v. Forsyth Furniture Lines, Inc.

23 F.2d 493, 1928 U.S. App. LEXIS 3199

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Druckman v. Forsyth Furniture Lines, Inc.. Read the opinion of the Court — 22 F.2d 59 →

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided January 10, 1928·No. No. 2629·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The plaintiff in error has presented a petition for rehearing, on the ground that the court overlooked the assignment of error which alleged error in the trial court in declining to grant his motion to set aside the verdiet and judgment, and grant a new trial, by reason of his alleged illness and unavoidable absence. The point was not overlooked, hut was fully discussed in the opinion in connection with the refusal of the trial court to grant a continuance. The granting or refusal of the motion for continuance was in the discretion of the trial court. The granting or refusal of the motion for new trial, was likewise in the discretion of the trial* court; and no useful purpose could have been subserved by further discussion.

Petition for rehearing denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The plaintiff in error has presented a petition for rehearing, on the ground that the court overlooked the assignment of error which alleged error in the trial court in declining to grant his motion to set aside the verdiet and judgment, and grant a new trial, by reason of his alleged illness and unavoidable absence. The point was not overlooked, hut was fully discussed in the opinion in connection with the refusal of the trial court to grant a continuance. The granting or refusal of the motion for continuance was in the discretion of the trial court. The granting or refusal of the motion for new trial, was likewise in the discretion of the trial* court; and no useful purpose could have been subserved by further discussion.

Petition for rehearing denied.

Druckman v. Forsyth Furniture Lines, Inc., 23 F.2d 493, 1928 U.S. App. LEXIS 3199 (4th Cir. 1928).

Pincite

23 F.2d 493 (Druckman v. Forsyth Furniture Lines, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.