DRS Laurel Technologies

Opinion

ARMED SERVICES BOARD OF CONTRACT APPEALS

Appeals of - )

)

DRS Laurel Technologies ) ASBCA Nos. 63059, 63151 )

Under Contract No. N00024-15-C-5228 )

APPEARANCES FOR THE APPELLANT: Neil H. O’Donnell, Esq.

Stephen L. Bacon, Esq. Rogers Joseph O’Donnell, PC San Francisco, CA

Timothy A. Wieroniey, Esq. Rogers Joseph O’Donnell, PC Washington, DC

APPEARANCES FOR THE GOVERNMENT: Allison M. McDade, Esq.

Navy Chief Trial Attorney Devin A. Wolak, Esq. Trial Attorney

OPINION BY ADMINISTRATIVE JUDGE EYESTER

The parties have resolved their dispute and request that the Board enter judgment in favor of appellant. It is the Board’s decision, pursuant to 41 U.S.C. §§ 7105(e), 7108(b), and the parties’ stipulation and agreement, that the appeals are sustained.

In the nature of a consent judgment, the Board makes a monetary award to appellant in the amount of $5,550,000. This amount is inclusive of Contract Disputes Act interest. No further interest shall be paid.

Dated: June 4, 2026

LAURA EYESTER Administrative Judge Armed Services Board of Contract Appeals

(Signatures continued)

I concur I concur

J. REID PROUTY MICHAEL O’CONNELL Administrative Judge Administrative Judge Acting Chairman Vice Chairman Armed Services Board Armed Services Board of Contract Appeals of Contract Appeals

I certify that the foregoing is a true copy of the Opinion and Decision of the Armed Services Board of Contract Appeals in ASBCA Nos. 63059, 63151, Appeals of DRS Laurel Technologies, rendered in conformance with the Board’s Charter.

Dated: June 5, 2026

PAULLA K. GATES-LEWIS Recorder, Armed Services Board of Contract Appeals