Drozdowski v. Washington Center for Addictions
319 N.E.2d 922, 2 Mass. App. Ct. 907, 1974 Mass. App. LEXIS 854
This text of 319 N.E.2d 922 (Drozdowski v. Washington Center for Addictions) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Massachusetts Appeals Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Drozdowski v. Washington Center for Addictions, 319 N.E.2d 922, 2 Mass. App. Ct. 907, 1974 Mass. App. LEXIS 854 (Mass. Ct. App. 1974).
Opinion
The order denying the petition to vacate judgment must be affirmed for the reasons stated in Mergupis v. Hackett, [908]*908331 Mass. 759 (1954). See also Sessler v. O’Donnell, 346 Mass. 778 (1964).
Order denying petition affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Mergupis v. Hackett
117 N.E.2d 154 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1954)
Sessler v. O'Donnell
195 N.E.2d 505 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1964)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
319 N.E.2d 922, 2 Mass. App. Ct. 907, 1974 Mass. App. LEXIS 854, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/drozdowski-v-washington-center-for-addictions-massappct-1974.