Drozdowski v. Washington Center for Addictions

319 N.E.2d 922, 2 Mass. App. Ct. 907, 1974 Mass. App. LEXIS 854
Massachusetts Appeals Court·Decided December 27, 1974·Published

Opinion

The order denying the petition to vacate judgment must be affirmed for the reasons stated in Mergupis v. Hackett, [908] 331 Mass. 759 (1954). See also Sessler v. O’Donnell, 346 Mass. 778 (1964).

Stanley Drozdowski, pro se. David M. Upton for the defendant.

Order denying petition affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Drozdowski v. Washington Center for Addictions, 319 N.E.2d 922, 2 Mass. App. Ct. 907, 1974 Mass. App. LEXIS 854 (Mass. Ct. App. 1974).

319 N.E.2d 922 (Drozdowski v. Washington Center for Addictions) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Mergupis v. Hackett
117 N.E.2d 154 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1954)
Sessler v. O'Donnell
195 N.E.2d 505 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1964)