Drott v. Bateman
20 Ohio C.C. 711
Opinion
A firm name showing the surnames only of the partners, is not a fictitious name, nor a designation not showing the names of the partners within the meaning of the act of February 13, 1896, 92 O. L., 25, requiring every firm doing business under a fictitious name to file and publish a certificate showing the full names and residences of its members.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Drott v. Bateman, 20 Ohio C.C. 711 (Ohio Super. Ct. 1899).
20 Ohio C.C. 711 (Drott v. Bateman) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Duris Enterprises v. Moore
458 N.E.2d 451 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 1983)