Drott v. Bateman & Harper
10 Ohio Cir. Dec. 824
Opinion
A firm name showing the surnames only of the partners, is not a fictitious name, nor a designation not showing the names of the partners within the meaning of the act of February 13, 1896, 92 O. L,., 25, requiring every 'firm doing business under such a name or designation to file and publish a certificate showing the full names and residences of its members.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Drott v. Bateman & Harper, 10 Ohio Cir. Dec. 824 (Ohio Super. Ct. 1899).
10 Ohio Cir. Dec. 824 (Drott v. Bateman & Harper) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Duris Enterprises v. Moore
458 N.E.2d 451 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 1983)