Drotar v. Pennsylvania Railroad Company
8 A.2d 299, 123 N.J.L. 201, 1939 N.J. LEXIS 353
Opinion
The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Mr. Justice Parker, in the Supreme Court.
For affirmance — The Chancellor, Case, Bodine, Donges, Heher, Perskie, Porter, Hetfield, Dear, WolfsKeil, Rafferty, Hague, JJ. 12.
For reversal — Hone.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Drotar v. Pennsylvania Railroad Company, 8 A.2d 299, 123 N.J.L. 201, 1939 N.J. LEXIS 353 (N.J. 1939).
8 A.2d 299 (Drotar v. Pennsylvania Railroad Company) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.