Droster v. Madrid
1 A.D.2d 835, 149 N.Y.S.2d 275, 1956 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6380
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedFebruary 14, 1956
StatusPublished
This text of 1 A.D.2d 835 (Droster v. Madrid) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Droster v. Madrid, 1 A.D.2d 835, 149 N.Y.S.2d 275, 1956 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6380 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1956).
Opinion
In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the appeal is from an order denying a motion for a preference, pursuant to rule 151 of the Rules of Civil Practice. Order affirmed, without costs. (See Guisenfitter v. City of New York, 284 App. Div. 899.) Nolan, P. J., Wenzel, Beldock, Murphy and Ughetta, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Guisenfitter v. City of New York
284 A.D. 899 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1954)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
1 A.D.2d 835, 149 N.Y.S.2d 275, 1956 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6380, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/droster-v-madrid-nyappdiv-1956.