Droster v. Madrid
1 A.D.2d 835, 149 N.Y.S.2d 275, 1956 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6380
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided February 14, 1956·Published
Opinion
In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the appeal is from an order denying a motion for a preference, pursuant to rule 151 of the Rules of Civil Practice. Order affirmed, without costs. (See Guisenfitter v. City of New York, 284 App. Div. 899.) Nolan, P. J., Wenzel, Beldock, Murphy and Ughetta, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Droster v. Madrid, 1 A.D.2d 835, 149 N.Y.S.2d 275, 1956 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6380 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1956).
1 A.D.2d 835 (Droster v. Madrid) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Guisenfitter v. City of New York
284 A.D. 899 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1954)