Dropick v. Rogers

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Dropick v. Rogers

219 A.D.2d 852, 632 N.Y.S.2d 1009, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10947

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided September 29, 1995·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Order unanimously affirmed without costs. Memorandum: Supreme Court did not err in granting defendant summary judgment dismissing the complaint as untimely under CPLR 215. It is undisputed that defendant intended to strike plaintiff, and thus the complaint sought damages for assault, not negligence (see, Mazzaferro v Albany Motel Enters., 127 AD2d 374, 376; see also, Salimbene v Merchants Mut. Ins. Co., 217 AD2d 991). (Appeal from Order of Supreme Court, Onondaga County, Nicholson, J. — Summary Judgment.) Present — Denman, P. J., Green, Wesley, Balio and Boehm, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order unanimously affirmed without costs. Memorandum: Supreme Court did not err in granting defendant summary judgment dismissing the complaint as untimely under CPLR 215. It is undisputed that defendant intended to strike plaintiff, and thus the complaint sought damages for assault, not negligence (see, Mazzaferro v Albany Motel Enters., 127 AD2d 374, 376; see also, Salimbene v Merchants Mut. Ins. Co., 217 AD2d 991). (Appeal from Order of Supreme Court, Onondaga County, Nicholson, J. — Summary Judgment.) Present — Denman, P. J., Green, Wesley, Balio and Boehm, JJ.

Dropick v. Rogers, 219 A.D.2d 852, 632 N.Y.S.2d 1009, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10947 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1995).

Pincite

219 A.D.2d 852 (Dropick v. Rogers) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related